Blog

Games in film are never just games. In fact, with everyday multi-player games, social play on screen often reveals power dynamics, collaboration, or rivalry. Board games, video games, and sports among friends and foes alike give us windows into relationships. But solo games? They dig deeper. Played in silence, often without spectators, they become intimate cinematic devices—less about competition and more about character.

Unlike multi-player games that externalise conflict or camaraderie, solo games illuminate what lies within. They are moments of solitude, obsession, control, or breakdown. When a character picks up a toy or puzzle, it’s often a signal: they are trying to cope, plan, or escape. The visual language of solo play—the shuffle of cards, the twist of a Rubik’s Cube, the silent press of a video game controller—tells us what dialogue often doesn’t.

Crucially, these scenes resonate because they strip away performance. A character playing alone doesn’t need to impress or deceive. They are exposed. The audience becomes their only witness. In this article, we turn our focus to these introspective cinematic moments—where characters retreat into games not to win, but to survive, remember, or forget.

Solitaire: A Quiet Symbol of Control or Collapse

No game is more synonymous with solitude than solitaire. In House of Cards, Frank Underwood spends countless hours absorbed in digital solitaire. It isn’t boredom that draws him in—it’s strategy, order, and calculated patience. Solitaire becomes his metaphor. The game is solitary and silent, much like the man himself, and it reflects his need to maintain a sense of control in a chaotic political world. In scenes where Frank clicks cards with mechanical precision, his detachment is on display.

Solitaire also serves as a moment of reflection or emotional suppression in other films. A character might use it to distance themselves from emotional chaos, reinforcing solitude not just physically but emotionally. The mental space created by playing solitaire mirrors the character’s inner world, often fractured or teetering on collapse. When a character plays solitaire obsessively, it raises questions: Are they hiding? Planning? Withdrawing? The absence of dialogue in these scenes turns the game into a monologue.

Chess Played Alone: Strategic Isolation

Chess is a game of logic and planning, but when played alone in film, it often signals detachment. In The Queen’s Gambit, Beth visualises entire chess matches in her mind, reenacting moves on the ceiling. It’s genius, but it’s isolating. These moments separate her from her peers, creating a visible rift between her intellect and the world. In X-Men, Magneto plays chess in his plastic prison. The game, played solo, becomes a stand-in for ideological battles he’s preparing for.

Chess represents a specific kind of intelligence—one that is long-term, patient, and deeply analytical. It’s not about solving a problem quickly, but about forecasting consequences, anticipating opponents’ moves, and managing multiple strategies at once. When a character plays chess alone, we understand that their mind is not at rest. They are rehearsing scenarios, training themselves for abstract conflict. Unlike playing with an opponent, where the focus is on adapting to new information in real time, solo chess shows a mind turning inward. The board becomes a metaphor for a future battleground.

It also suggests self-containment and emotional withdrawal. A character playing chess alone may not trust others to challenge them or may have outgrown them intellectually. Their only worthy opponent is themselves, or perhaps an imagined rival. It’s not a game in the traditional sense—it’s a ritual. 

In cinema, this kind of solo chess play tells us that the character is not merely smart, but that their intelligence is a burden. It distances them from others. It isolates. And it often foreshadows morally ambiguous or even dangerous paths. While collaborative chess might build camaraderie or rivalry, solitary chess builds walls. It is the strategist’s echo chamber, and on screen, that silence speaks volumes.

Rubik’s Cube: Fast Logic, Genius on Display

While solo chess signals long-form strategy, the Rubik’s Cube brings a burst of improvisational genius. In The Pursuit of Happyness, Chris Gardner (played by Will Smith) solves a Rubik’s Cube in the back of a taxi. It’s a pivotal scene—the moment his intelligence becomes undeniable to a potential employer. The cube, in this case, isn’t just a toy; it’s a test of wit, speed, and adaptability.

The Rubik’s Cube operates in compressed time. Unlike chess, which implies drawn-out contemplation, the cube demands fast pattern recognition and physical agility. Its colorful structure and dynamic movement make it a striking visual object. Solving it quickly—especially under pressure—immediately signals high-functioning intellect. But it also suggests a modern, street-smart kind of brilliance. Unlike the calculated and sometimes elitist connotations of chess, the Rubik’s Cube feels accessible. It’s often the domain of quick learners, of self-taught minds who bend logic on the fly.

This makes it the perfect shorthand for resourceful intelligence. In Gardner’s case, it shows that brilliance can come from unlikely places and that intellect doesn’t always wear a suit. The cube is about confidence, precision, and adaptability—it’s problem-solving in real time, without the burden of overthinking.

Where solo chess can signal a descent into obsessive control, the Rubik’s Cube suggests something more hopeful: that quick thinking can change your circumstances. It’s a cinematic nod to potential, to talent waiting to be recognised. 

Video Games and Escapism in Her

In Her, Theo retreats from real-world relationships and immerses himself in technology. One way this is expressed is through a video game he plays alone at home. It’s a holographic, voice-activated experience, but the loneliness is palpable. He doesn’t play to win. He plays to feel something. The game is a virtual echo chamber where his emotions bounce off AI characters.

In a way, Her paints gaming as more than escapism—it’s emotional dependence. The game becomes a mirror of Theo’s growing reliance on artificial interactions, especially as he falls in love with an AI.

In this case, the game serves as foreshadowing. It predicts a future where emotional fulfilment is outsourced to machines, and reality becomes optional. Solo video games, when portrayed this way, reveal a character’s deep yearning for connection—and how far they’ll go to simulate it.

Panic Pete and Fidget Toys: Anxiety in the Hands

In Jurassic Park, Dennis Nedry, the disgruntled programmer, sits in the control room gripping a Panic Pete stress toy. The Jurassic Pedia entry identifies this moment not just as a sign of stress but of underlying instability. Nedry’s actions are erratic, and the toy is a silent tell—a visual marker for his fraying nerves.

Unlike structured games, fidget toys aren’t about outcome. They are coping mechanisms. In cinema, they’re used to show characters with anxiety, ADHD, or those under immense pressure. The act of squeezing, tapping, or spinning something small signals that something larger is happening internally. Fidget toys don’t demand focus—but they reflect a fractured one.

The contrast between fidget toys and traditional solo games is essential—they reveal something reactive, subconscious, even childlike. In the hands of characters like Nedry, they highlight panic, impulsivity, and vulnerability in tense environments. They are visual shorthand for tension without a word spoken.

Yo-Yo as Unexpected Power: Gogo Yubari and Sukeban Deka

Yo-yos are rarely treated as games in cinema. More often, they appear as weapons—unexpected, creative, and deadly. In Kill Bill Vol. 1, Gogo Yubari’s weaponised yo-yo is both playful and terrifying, turning childhood innocence into something brutal. Her character is inspired by Sukeban Deka, a Japanese series where a high school girl uses a metal yo-yo to fight crime.

In both cases, the yo-yo represents misdirection—it looks harmless until it isn’t. On-screen, it becomes a symbol of unpredictability and surprising strength, often tied to characters who defy traditional expectations. These weaponised toys reflect skill, precision, and cool control. Their choreography is visual poetry—graceful, quick, lethal.

While fidget toys reveal inner chaos, the yo-yo reveals controlled intensity. It’s the quiet before the storm—the soft flick of the wrist that could mean death in the next second. It transforms play into power.

Playing Cards Alone: Ritual and Repetition

In films like No Country for Old Men or The Road, solitary characters flick through playing cards not to win, but to do something—anything. The action is quiet, repetitive, and often tinged with dread. These scenes show how games become rituals, used to stave off chaos or make time pass.

A card game played alone reflects trauma, survival, and the thin thread of normalcy. In The Road, a father might shuffle a deck just to remind himself of structure in a world stripped of it. It’s not about rules or points. It’s about control.

These small rituals ground the character, giving them something tangible amid abstract suffering. In these moments, cards are not games but anchors—tangible reminders of civility in bleak worlds. The more tattered the deck, the more meaningful the act.

Solo games in cinema are rarely about entertainment. They are storytelling shortcuts that give us deep access to a character’s emotional world. Whether it’s the quiet calculation of solitaire, the desperate fidgeting of a stress toy, or the existential escape of a video game, these moments help us understand what words might never say.

They reveal genius, anxiety, loneliness, power, or ritual in just a flick of the hand. They are character study, psychological cue, and thematic device rolled into one. Next time you watch a character reach for a toy, puzzle, or game—pay close attention. You’re likely watching the plot unfold in silence.